Oh boy. Looks like I’ve hit a nerve by taking Startup Riot as an example under “Ambiguity” category in my last post. I confess I’m flattered that my two cents caused such a stir. Thank you for listening and for expressing your views. But, I’ll attempt to clarify a few points in order to eliminate any confusion and/or anger for daring to be vocal. Hopefully, comments with profanity will not need to be moderated – it’s not asking too much to be civil even in disagreement. Is it?

Firstly, I or my company, Simply Web, Inc. does not in any way benefit commercially from Atlanta technology startups scene. It simply isn’t our market – Startup Riot being one of them. Neither am I affiliated with any of the startups and/or individuals mentioned. My personal interest in technology leads me to attend startup events nationwide – call it a hobby. Some of the best minds can be found in these unstructured events which often lead to innovation, another of my passion.

So, if I’ve no vested interest why the write-up? Because, that allows me to be objective but, more importantly, I’d like Atlanta to lead technology innovation in the Southeast. The chance of that is slim when closed door policies, unfairness and/or favoritism are practiced. It is very easy to agree or be popular – it takes courage to voice difference. Criticisms are designed for improvement and not personal attacks – unless you choose to take it so. Or, just ignore.

Apart from the comments, I was made aware that there apparently is a huge buzz around my post on Twitter. Since I don’t know who or what they are I cannot address them. But, debate is always welcome – it illustrates enough people are listening.

THEOLOGY

a) Established: Both TAG (Technology Association of Georgia) and TechLinks newsletters used to include Breakfast Bible Study (or similar) serieses. Since I’m not a reader of newsletters any more because of time constraint, I’m not sure if it’s still practiced. Religion should not be included in technology scenes. b) Startups: Founders of various organizations often mention religious services – church services, High Tech Breakfast, Bible breakfast meetings, etc. What a person does during his or her personal time is private, but, when wearing a company and/or organizational hat, he or she must be neutral. That takes me back to my original question: what does religion have to do with technology? Nothing.

Conclusion: Religion is heavily embedded in Atlanta technology scene. It’s a fact – I’m often asked about my faith first in these gatherings, before any conversation starts. I’ve not encountered the same in tech scenes in other cities. Not only is the question rude but is irrelevant. Although I’ve adapted to these ignorant questions, these practices simply cannot continue for the community to lead.

UPDATE: I was asked by the executive editor of a local tech blog if they could post a rebuttal I may write in response to the buzz created by my last post. I agreed but was vetoed by their CEO and editor, one of the five reason being -

3) How exactly does the South’s Christian-slant on religion hurt our (technology hub’s) international stance and talent pool?

Does any one else in the Atlanta tech scene see a problem with that question itself? It should be noted here my suggestion was to exclude any and all religion (non-religion) from tech scenes simply because, again, religion has absolutely nothing to do with technology. If no one else can see the danger in bringing religion (and politics) in the tech scene, then we have much bigger a problem than I thought and much work lies ahead to eliminate those challenges.

AMBIGUITY

Startup Riot

a) I initially took an interest because I was told, repeatedly, that it was THE Atlanta tech startup event to attend. b) Some of the people attending were from the service industry. At the same time, it came to my attention that many people from the exact same industry (staffing companies, angel investors, seed funding, social media, marketing/sales) were not allowed. c) Not knowing much about the event/organization or organizers, I turned to their web site to learn more. Sure enough there was a “Who can’t attend” section with service industry excluded. Having confirmed unfair practices, I simply chose not to participate. d) Why was Startup Riot an example? That was the first event that came to my mind, perhaps because it had taken place recently as were the complaints made. e) Why did I hear alarm bells? If that was THE event where double standards were practiced, then we have a problem. Something must be said – who better to say it than someone who is neutral and has nothing to gain? f) Why the public post? To quote someone (?) at a conference call with SAP, “if you see unfair practices, raise your hand and scream, if discussion through private channels doesn’t work“. Numerous private conversations with influential people didn’t receive as much attention as this blog did. Perhaps going public is needed for change. g) This event/organization is merely an example of what’s ailing startup tech community in Atlanta. Some organizers doing it right are user groups/barcamps – Atlanta Web Design Group, Atlanta Mobile Developers Group, Atlanta PHP User Group and many others.

As I mentioned in earlier post, more pointers are forthcoming. Why? Perhaps I want to share my experience and my observations because I myself was a startup once and know the challenges all too well. Unfortunately, not much mindset has changed in the last three years or so. It will happen – it’s simply taking a little longer than I had predicted.

Tags: Atlanta Mobile Developers Group, Atlanta Web Design Group, startups, TAG, tech, TechLinks, Twitter
Posted in Best Practices, Technology |

Remember Enron? More recently AIG? What did these two corporations have in common? Corruption and ethics violation.

Corporations do not collapse overnight. Corruption start in small doses, a little stealing here and a little stealing there. Very soon, that appetite for greed and total disregard for corporate standard of business conduct consume the greedy, dragging down the corporation along the way. These violations always occur at the top of the ladder. Unfortunate but history tells us so. Violation of ethics and corporate compliance should be stopped early.

Most companies formulate policies, often known as corporate compliance and ethics guidelines, that pretty much is – or should be – the backbone of a corporation. These policies set standards for internal employees as well as relationships with vendors and partners. Many companies take these guidelines seriously providing seminars and training employees to practice business standards set forth.

When a senior vice president of a publicly traded corporation is entrusted with added responsibility of overseeing  specific operations and performance, it becomes her responsibility to engage teams most suited for a specific job in the best interest of the corporation she serves. But when she engages or exerts influence so that her husband is hired, it’s a conflict of interest. Furthermore, she stands to receive direct financial gain by giving or influencing her husband to get the job. If that step involved zero opportunity for other competitors then the misconduct is much more serious and should be investigated, at the least. But the most obvious? You simply cannot, and should not, hire your spouse if you don’t own the company.

It is healthy to have competition and for corporations to practice equal opportunity. But, when privileged information is stolen under false pretense, it is not a competition. It’s dishonesty and playing dirty.

Recently, I evaluated and had lengthy discussions with a former executive of perhaps one of the largest corporation and the most recognized brand in the world. Learning of my intention, one of my well wisher advised me against engaging him. My advisor thought he was not a good fit for us and reminded me that his wife was our competitor. However, the gentleman assured me that our and his wife’s space were very different – our focus is on large corporations, his wife’s on small to mid sized market. With that clarification and verbal assurance, I briefed him on a couple of companies I had studied. Little did I know he was sharing my privileged information with his wife. Worse still, he encouraged his wife to pursue the very companies that he was gathering information from me, under the false pretense of working for us. Mind you, this is the same gentleman who once ran an IT division for one of the largest corporation. It gets more interesting: one of the employee of his wife is the husband of the senior vice president, mentioned above, whose office has the direct authority to oversee the hiring as mentioned earlier.

Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive!

Looking back I feel sorry for him, even though he was dishonest and demonstrated poor integrity. Without a corporate title, the person that is left behind is the true nature of an individual. When that proves to be devoid of basic human decency, it is a very sad image. Here was a man who received very handsome severance package, has a daughter nearly my age, betrayed my trust and cheated a very young company, all for some instant profit? Monetary gain is fleeting – money disappear as quickly as they appear – but the reputation you leave behind and the impact you have on people, will follow you to your grave. After 20 to 25 years in the corporate world, last many years holding executive positions, should have left him with dignity, honesty and self-respect. But, he failed to reveal any of those traits. What can be sadder than that?

Businesses are run by people. The success, or failure, are the result of the conducts of those same people. Without executing ethics and best practices, I doubt any corporation can survive. It is to my advantage that I’m rational, objective and practice zero favoritism at work – running a very small company compared to that corporation – so much so that my inner circle of people feel they need to watch my back, since I myself don’t do it, as someone put it recently, while friends are sometimes offended when we hire the best person qualified over them.

And what about that senior vice president? She violated the Corporate Standard of Business Conduct of the very company she serves as stated on that policy in Section 4 and 5 of certain pages.

Is business ethics really a gray area as the sage, above, claims or is it simply good for our business?

Tags: AIG, Business, compliance, Enron, ethics
Posted in Best Practices, Business |